By Bryan Mena, CNN
Washington (CNN) — The Federal Reserve on Wednesday lowered interest rates again in a continued effort to keep the labor market intact, despite objections from several key Fed officials who believe the central bank should be prioritizing the higher cost of living instead.
A majority of policymakers voted to lower the benchmark lending rate by a quarter point for the third consecutive time, to a range of between 3.5% to 3.75%, the lowest in more than three years.
Wednesday’s decision drew three dissents — from Fed Governor Stephen Miran, Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee — the highest number of dissents since September 2019.
It’s also the fourth consecutive meeting that a Fed decision wasn’t unanimous, the longest stretch since 2019.
In their latest economic projections, Fed officials penciled in just one rate cut next year, unchanged from their estimate in September. However, their latest policy statement suggests they’re leaning toward staying on hold in the near term, stating they will “carefully assess” the “extent and timing” of any additional cuts.
More dissent than is typical
This year’s rate cuts have been in response to mounting signs of a weakening labor market, including unusually slow job growth and higher unemployment among young people and minorities.
But those decisions haven’t been easy, with the Fed’s powerful rate-setting committee starkly divided on how to proceed with interest rates. While job growth has been stagnant, inflation remains well above the Fed’s 2% target and is widely expected to creep higher next year as President Donald Trump’s tariffs pack a bigger punch.
Fed officials are in disagreement in Chair Jerome Powell’s final few meetings at the helm of the central bank, clashing over which side of their dual mandate to prioritize: full employment or stable prices.
Miran cast a dissenting vote, just he did in the prior two meetings, backing a larger, half-point cut instead. Schmid, who also dissented at the prior meeting, again preferred to keep rates unchanged, this time joined by Goolsbee.
But the unusual division among Fed officials isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Powell has characterized it as a “healthy debate” and several experts have told CNN that some level of disagreement moderates the Fed’s behavior and shows there isn’t groupthink. Still, it makes it more difficult for Wall Street to assess the path of monetary policy.
In the weeks after the Fed’s October decision when officials lowered rates for the second time this year, investors were split over whether there would be another rate cut in December — until New York Fed President John Williams weighed in.
Williams serves in a role that’s historically closely aligned with the Fed chair, and in a November 21 speech, Williams said the bigger risk is around the labor market’s health. Wall Street’s expectations for a December flipped to around 70% from 40% after Williams spoke, according to futures.
The path forward
Economists say there’s a higher bar for another rate cut as soon as January, or at any point in 2026, likely requiring higher unemployment over a short period of time. The Labor Department next week releases inflation and employment data for October and November, which could easily shift the economic narrative in either direction.
Fed officials’ expectations for just one cut in the coming year is in stark contrast with Trump’s persistent demands for massive rate cuts.
The president has said he’s close to naming the next Fed chair, to succeed Powell once his term ends in May. Trump said Tuesday in an interview with Politico that Powell’s successor will be expected to cut rates, which wouldn’t be easy for that person to accomplish because of the Fed’s structure.
The Fed chair has only one vote and cannot unilaterally veto the majority’s policy decisions, meaning Trump’s pick for Fed chair will have to persuade their colleagues to go along with several more rate cuts.
Two Fed officials who become voters next year – Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack – have already expressed in recent public speeches reservations with lowering rates further. Among the Fed’s 12 regional bank presidents, only four get voting power each year on a rotating basis, in addition to the New York Fed president, who has a permanent vote.
This story is developing and will be updated.
The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
