If the bill somehow came due today for Connecticut”™s obligations to state employees for their retirement benefits, every man, woman and child in the state would have to hand over $12,000.
Throw in the rest of Connecticut”™s long-term debt to pay back state borrowing, and the check would have to be upped to $19,900. The tab for a family of four would be $79,000.
It sounds crazy, and it is.
On top of the state”™s budget gap of $3.7 billion for fiscal year 2012, Connecticut”™s unfunded liabilities of $70 billion represent the worst per capita debt load in the nation. Most of it, $42 billion, is the state”™s obligation to public sector employees for their retirement benefits.
Nothing has undermined business confidence or economic recovery in Connecticut more than the state”™s monumental fiscal crisis. Negotiating retiree health and pension benefits to make them more sustainable would go a long way to renewing private-sector confidence in Connecticut.
In fact, Gov. Malloy recently said, “For Connecticut to move beyond its current economic crisis ”¦ we”™re going to need to make headway with our employees on returning to a sustainable system of compensation and benefit allocation.”
Last week, the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21st Century released its latest study that compares Connecticut with other states on the handling of its long-term debt for public-sector employees. While Connecticut has been among the slowest of states to respond to the debt problem, the good news, says the institute, is that there are lessons we can learn from other states.
In the last two years, 40 states took at least one action to modify their state employee pension programs. This year the pace is quickening. Most frequently, says the institute, states have either raised employee contribution rates or adjusted state contributions. Many states have changed the income-averaging period from a three-year average to a five-year average. Some states have also raised threshold retirement ages and frozen cost-of-living adjustments.
Thirteen states have moved away from defined benefit plan (which provides a monthly benefit to participants at retirement) to a defined contribution plan similar to 401(k) plans offered by private-sector employers.
The largest portion of the $42 billion benefits debt is for state retiree health care benefits. Connecticut is meeting its health care obligations for its current retirees but often fails to meet the requirement for future retirees. While the state paid $457 million in 2009 to insure current retirees, the state failed to set aside an additional $1.5 billion to cover the future costs of current employees.
States also are requiring their current employees (and in some cases those who have already retired) to contribute to, or increase their contributions to the funds. Some are tightening eligibility requirements to require more years of service before retirees gain access to benefits; others are encouraging early retirements in order to increase the number of new hires, and therefore, people contributing to their benefits systems.
Connecticut now requires new hires to contribute 3 percent of pay for the retiree medical plan for their first 10 years of service. They must also have at least 10 years of service, or based on age and service, meet the rule of 75, in order to qualify for the benefits.
Much needs to be done to reduce Connecticut”™s extraordinary and economy-stifling debt. It”™s critical for a sustainable state budget that the public-sector unions meet with Gov. Malloy as he has requested and agree to changes in these areas.
Peter Gioia is vice president and economist at the Connecticut Business & Industry Association. Reach him at pete.gioia@cbia.com.
Let’s cut to the chase….
Private sector employers typically contribute 3%-8% of an employee’s cash pay towards retirement, yet the total cost (expressed as a level annual % of cash pay) of Public sector Defined Benefit pensions (for a 30-year employee retiring at age 55) ranges from 29% to 58% depending on the richness of the benefit formula (with safety workers generally at the highest end).
Even after deducting the typical employee contribution of about 5% of pay, that still leaves TAXPAYERS contributing 24% to 53% of pay. The middle of these %s is 38.5% vs 5.5% (the middle of the range of what Private sector employer’s contribute) or SEVEN (yes SEVEN) times greater.
This is completely absurd, and the idiodic “tweaking” at the edges by practically begging employees for a few more percent of pay conributions will NOT even begin solve the HUGE financial problem.
Not for PAST service, but for FUTURE service, Public Sector pension accruals must immediately be brought FULLY down to the level of their Private Sector counterparts. Due to the huge reduction needed, the ONLY ONLY ONLY way to do this is to freeze the current defined benefit plans for CURRENT (yes CURRENT) workers, and switch everyone into a 401K-style Defined contribution Plan with an employer contribution in the same 3%-8% range granted Private Sector workers.
Does anyone fail to remember that our Senators, Congressmen, and Presidents take a SIGNIFICANT toll on expenses with THEIR BENEFITS??? Not once have I seen anyone address the fact that our Senators and Congressmen have really fat cat benefits once they retire, which makes the State Employee benefits look like THEIR pocket change!!! Would someone please address this?? Why is this NEVER mentioned??