Home Combined Details on CT tolls bill could come next Tuesday, I-684 still in...

Details on CT tolls bill could come next Tuesday, I-684 still in the mix

SHARE

Connecticut’s long-awaited transportation bill, which will include tolls for tractor-trailers on 12 highways around Connecticut, including Interstate 684, should be finished early next week, according to Democratic leaders.

The bill, which would institute Gov. Ned Lamont’s 10-year, $19 billion CT2030 transportation initiative, would then be subject to a five-day public comment period before being voted upon. Democrats said they are working to release its details to the public on Jan. 21.

I-684 Ned Lamont tolls Greenwich
Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont wants to place a toll gantry along a section of Interstate 684 that runs through Greenwich. The Greenwich American Centre can be seen in the top left of the photo. The building is in the westernmost section of the Connecticut town. Photo by Bob Rozycki

Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, indicated that the vote would take place during a special session the week of Jan. 27. The next regular session begins on Feb. 5.

While bringing electronic tolls back to Connecticut’s highways has been a contentious issues between state Democrats and Republicans – and CT2030’s inclusion of a gantry on a 1.4-mile stretch of I-684 in New York that passes through Greenwich has caused great perturbation among New Yorkers – a pair of new polls would appear to indicate the public is in favor of the idea.

A poll of 500 likely voters conducted Jan. 6-9 by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner found that 51% of respondents were in favor of the initiative and 42% were against. That follows a recent Hartford Courant Sacred Heart University poll of 1,000 residents, which found 47.5% of respondents supporting a trucks-only toll system, including 62.1% of Democrats and 38.8% of Republicans. Just 34.7% supported tolls in a March 2019 poll, although at that time Lamont was seeking tolls on all vehicles at 50 gantries.

As for concerns that it could only be a matter of time before “trucks-only” becomes “all vehicles,” Democratic leaders said the legislation would specify that tolls for passenger cars will not be allowed.

Under the current plan, tolls would be located at:

  • I-84 over the Housatonic River on the Newtown-Southbury border, at the Rochambeau Bridge
  • I-95 over Metro-North Commuter Railroad bridge in Stamford
  • I-95 over Route 33 in Westport
  • I-684 over the Byram River in Greenwich
  • The Mixmaster at the intersection of Routes 84 and 8 in Waterbury
  • I-84 over Berkshire Road in West Hartford
  • The Charter Oak Bridge in Hartford
  • I-95 over the Metro-North railroad in West Haven
  • I-95 over Route 161 in East Lyme
  • The Gold Star Memorial Bridge between Groton and New London on I-95 over the Thames River
  • I-395 over the Moosup River in Plainfield
  • Route 8 south of I-84 in Waterbury

Republicans, who have long been steadfast in their opposition to tolls of any kind, expressed their dissatisfaction with the governor for not sharing the bill’s details with them ahead of the vote.

“He submitted a tolls bill to Democrat legislative leaders, but he won’t share it with the public, the press, rank-and-file Democrats, or any Republican lawmaker,” said Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven. “Republicans have asked the governor’s office for details on the new plan repeatedly through letters and direct outreach and have still not received answers to any of our questions, let alone a copy of the bill.

“If Gov. Lamont is confident in his plan,” Fasano continued, “why won’t he share it with the public, or at the very least the lawmakers who he is asking to vote on it? What doesn’t he want us to know? I can only assume something is in the bill, or not in the bill, that he wants to keep away from the public.

“We are talking about a $19 billion cost for state taxpayers, and there is zero transparency,” he concluded. “It’s outrageous that Republicans cannot even get a response to our questions and lawmakers from both parties are being kept in the dark.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 COMMENTS

  1. Interesting conjecture. This is a textbook example of paid pollsters delivering results intended to convince the public that support for an issue has reached critical mass.

    How many readers will now shrug their shoulders and accept their “fate”? How many will stop calling their representatives and senators demanding they abandon tolls?

    How many know the poll was done by Rosa DeLauro’s husband, a noted democrat partisan hack?

  2. The poll cited in the article contacted only half the people Sacred Heart quarterly polls do. Sacred Heart’s questions have been consistently objective and unbiased without “push” phrasing. Sacred Heart and Quinnipiac polls are not commissioned by “environmental and labor groups” with pro-tolls objectives. Public opinion polls from Sacred Heart & Quinnipiac during the past 10 years show Ct citizens oppose tolls. Those are facts.

    Yes, “A tolls opponent failed to win a special session for a House seat Tuesday.” To include the WHOLE truth, a tolls opponent also WON on Tuesday.

    Let’s have the entire truth told. A new survey that included “push” questioning was commissioned by tolls supporting groups and contradicts TEN YEARS of objective polling commissioned by two unbiased universities.

    The new poll claimed 64% in favor of the truck tolls plan. That is based on this biased and mis-leading statement read to the people polled: “The revenue from the tolls on trucks would be put in a dedicated fund for improvements to transportation…”

    Translation = “The revenue from the tolls on trucks that transport goods to and within Connecticut would be put in a dedicated fund for improvements to trains, buses, ports, roads and bridges.” If it follows the pattern of how STF money is used more will go to trains and buses than to roads and bridges.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here